Earned Value Management (EVM)

June 29, 2026 · 6 min read

TL;DR: EVM compares what you planned to spend, what you've actually spent, and what you've actually completed — expressed as three numbers (PV, EV, AC) that drive every other formula. Get those three right and the rest follows.

What are the three baseline values in EVM?

EVM is built on three measurements at any point in time:

ValueFull namePlain meaning
PVPlanned ValueHow much work should be done by now (budgeted cost of scheduled work)
EVEarned ValueHow much work is actually done (budgeted cost of work performed)
ACActual CostHow much you actually spent on the work done so far
BACBudget at CompletionTotal approved budget for the whole project

What do SV, CV, SPI, and CPI tell you?

The variances and indexes are all derived from EV, PV, and AC:

MetricFormulaGood / Bad signal
SV (Schedule Variance)EV − PVPositive = ahead of schedule; negative = behind
CV (Cost Variance)EV − ACPositive = under budget; negative = over budget
SPI (Schedule Performance Index)EV / PV>1 = ahead; <1 = behind; 1.0 = on track
CPI (Cost Performance Index)EV / AC>1 = under budget; <1 = over budget; 1.0 = on track

The trap the bank exploits: candidates mix up variance sign convention. A negative CV means you've spent more than the work was worth — that's over budget and bad. The wrong-answer option says "the project is under budget" to catch candidates who misread the minus sign.

How do you forecast the final cost (EAC)?

EAC (Estimate at Completion) has multiple formulas on the PMP exam. The choice depends on what the scenario tells you about future performance:

AssumptionFormula
Current variance is atypical — future work will be at budgetEAC = AC + (BAC − EV)
Current CPI will continue for the rest of the projectEAC = BAC / CPI
Both SPI and CPI will continue (weighted forecast)EAC = AC + [(BAC − EV) / (CPI × SPI)]
Re-estimated from scratch (bottom-up)EAC = AC + ETC (new estimate)

The bank's Information Gain: the wrong answers use the right formula with the wrong assumption. Read the scenario carefully — if it says "the team expects to perform at the same efficiency going forward," that's the BAC/CPI formula. If it says "the variance was a one-off," that's AC + (BAC − EV).

What is VAC and TCPI?

VAC (Variance at Completion): BAC − EAC. Positive means you expect to finish under budget; negative means over. This is a forecast, not a guarantee.

TCPI (To-Complete Performance Index): the CPI you need on all remaining work to hit your target. Formula: (BAC − EV) / (BAC − AC) to hit original budget, or (BAC − EV) / (EAC − AC) to hit a revised EAC. TCPI > 1.0 means the remaining work must be done more efficiently than anything so far — a useful red flag. Getting an EVM question wrong only teaches you something if you know which formula or sign you missed — a plain "incorrect" doesn't.

Try it yourself

Practice EVM questions on PMP Practice come with the wrong answers explained by name — which formula the distractor uses and which assumption it gets wrong — instead of just marked incorrect. Try the free 20-question sample — no card, no signup required.

Related: Evaluating Project Status: Read the Variance Before You Report It for what the exam wants you to do with a bad CPI once you have it, and Cost Baseline, Budget, and Reserves: The Money Terms Candidates Mix Up for where BAC comes from and what sits outside it. The domain walkthrough is at /study/process.

FAQ

What does a negative CV actually mean?

You've spent more than the work was worth — that's over budget and bad. The wrong-answer option says "the project is under budget" to catch candidates who misread the minus sign.

Which EAC formula do you use if the current CPI is expected to continue?

EAC = BAC / CPI. If the scenario instead says the variance was a one-off, use EAC = AC + (BAC − EV) instead — the wrong answers use the right formula with the wrong assumption.

What does TCPI greater than 1.0 signal?

That the remaining work must be done more efficiently than anything so far — a useful red flag, since it means past performance can't just continue at the same rate to hit the target.